National research on eviction geography and case flow Call (678) 300-5766
Research programme

National eviction geography, honest operational measures

Eviction Labs publishes a research directory for every U.S. state, county and major city — and separately measures how cases move after a filing, from EvictIQ’s own completed cases. The geography is national. The operational sample is not. We keep those facts on the same page.

Eviction Labs — national eviction research
Eviction Labs — national eviction research and case-flow measures
Two kinds of work, labeled as such. Location and ranking pages cite public sources — primarily Princeton Eviction Lab (2016 rankings extract) and the U.S. Census Bureau. Operational measures (case aging, filing-to-hearing, judgment-to-writ) remain EvictIQ’s own completed cases and are historically Georgia-heavy. EvictIQ has not completed cases in every U.S. county. No number is created to earn a link.
Geography

Every state, county, and major city

A filing is a court case, not a lockout. These pages explain that, link counties to their state, and show a cited Eviction Lab figure only when the source file actually contains one.

Locations

50 states and D.C., every Census county-equivalent, and major cities (Census places ~100k+ plus high-eviction metros).

Open the directory →

Highest filers — cities

Eviction Lab 2016 large-city judgments and rates. Filing counts are omitted where the extract does not include them.

City rankings →

Highest filers — states

The same Eviction Lab extract at state level, plus a city table for each state that has cited rows.

State rankings →
Operational findings are not yet published. The measure definitions below are complete and public. The analyses that populate them are in preparation, and nothing appears as a finding until the underlying work is done. Those measures describe EvictIQ’s book — not a national court census.
Measures

Six things worth measuring

Each has a published definition covering population, computation, reporting form, cuts and suppression rules. The population is EvictIQ completed cases, not every U.S. filing.

Case Aging

Case aging measures the distribution of how long currently-open eviction cases have been open, measured from filing. It is the standard…

Measure definition →

Filing to Hearing

The interval between the dispossessory being filed and the case being heard, for cases that reach a hearing. It is largely a measure of…

Measure definition →

Judgment to Writ

The interval from judgment entry to the writ of possession actually being executed. In our records this is consistently the stage with …

Measure definition →

Writ and Setout Delays

A decomposition of the reasons an execution window was missed, rescheduled, or ran long, coded from our completion reports.…

Measure definition →

Cost Benchmarks

The distribution of realised cost by stage across completed cases, alongside estimated lost rent for the same cases where rent is recor…

Measure definition →

Portfolio Delinquency

How delinquency is distributed within portfolios — concentration, persistence, and what share resolves without a filing.…

Measure definition →
Standards

What we commit to

Aggregate only, never identifiable

Nothing we publish contains tenant names, addresses, case numbers or any detail that could identify a household. Counts below a disclosure threshold are suppressed rather than published thin.

Methodology before findings

Every figure is published alongside how it was computed, what population it covers, and what it excludes. A number without a method attached is marketing, not research.

We describe our own book, and say so

Operational records are the cases EvictIQ worked. That is an operationally rich sample and a biased one — it over-represents owners who hire a service and is historically Georgia-heavy. We state that rather than implying nationwide completed-case coverage we don't have.

No number gets created to earn a link

If the data doesn't support a finding, we don't publish one. Ranking pages omit filing counts when the cited Eviction Lab extract does not include them. A research programme that manufactures statistics for backlinks is worth less than no research programme.

Corrections are published, not quietly edited

If we get something wrong, the correction goes on the page with a date.

Publication schedule

What is up, and what is in preparation

ReportCadenceCoversStatus
National geography directoryMaintainedState, county and major-city pages; process education; cited public sources only.Published
Eviction Lab ranking extractsAs source updates2016 city and state judgments and rates, labeled; filing counts omitted where absent.Published
County filing-count rankingNot in the Eviction Lab rankings extract we commit. Page states the gap.Data forthcoming
Georgia eviction filing reportAnnualFiling volume and disposition across EvictIQ Georgia case records.In preparation
Metro Atlanta case-flow reportQuarterlyCycle time by stage across the metro counties we work.In preparation
County-by-county cycle timeQuarterlyMedian and spread per county we work, with exclusion rates — not all U.S. counties.In preparation
Writ and setout delay analysisAnnualCoded reasons execution windows are missed or run long.In preparation
Eviction cost structureAnnualRealised cost by stage against estimated lost rent.In preparation
Portfolio delinquency outlookAnnualDelinquency structure and resolution paths across managed portfolios.In preparation
Questions

About this programme

Is this an academic research organisation?

No. Eviction Labs is the research programme of EvictIQ. We publish a national geography directory and operational data from EvictIQ's own completed cases. We state that plainly because the alternative would be misleading.

Is this Georgia-only?

Geography pages cover every U.S. state, county-equivalent and major city. EvictIQ operational measures — case aging, filing-to-hearing, judgment-to-writ — come from EvictIQ's own completed cases and are historically Georgia-heavy. That sample is not nationwide field coverage.

Where do ranking numbers come from?

City and state ranking tables cite Princeton Eviction Lab's published 2016 rankings extract (judgments and eviction rates). Filing counts are omitted when that extract does not include them. We do not invent volumes to earn a link. See evictionlab.org/rankings.

Where do operational measures come from?

EvictIQ case records — cases prepared, filed, served or completed. That makes the operational detail unusually rich and the sample unrepresentative of all evictions. Both are true and we publish both.

Do you publish tenant information?

Never. Nothing we publish contains tenant names, addresses, case numbers or any detail that could identify a household, and cells below our disclosure threshold are suppressed.

Can I cite these figures?

Yes, with attribution and with the caveat stated on the page: EvictIQ operational figures are one provider's book; ranking volumes are the named public source and year. The methodology page states exactly what each figure covers.

Can I get the underlying data?

Aggregate datasets are published alongside reports. Record-level EvictIQ data is never released. Eviction Lab publishes its own downloads.

Do you take commissions or sponsored research?

No. Everything published here is our own analysis of our own records or a cited public extract.

Request a data briefing

For journalists, analysts and portfolio owners who want the detail ahead of publication.

Free download

Methodology note

Populations, missing-data handling, disclosure thresholds.

Managing a portfolio?

We run these same operational measures against a single portfolio as a private assessment. Eviction services live on sister sites — this site stays research.